Effect of landscape configuration on bee communities (Apoidea) of an oak-pine

Authors

  • Natalia Escobedo Kenefic Instituto de Investigaciones Quí­micas y Biológicas
  • Marí­a José Dardón Peralta Instituto de Investigaciones Quí­micas y Biológicas
  • Jessica Esmeralda López Instituto de Investigaciones Quí­micas y Biológicas
  • Oscar Martí­nez Instituto de Investigaciones Quí­micas y Biológicas
  • Edson Cardona Instituto de Investigaciones Quí­micas y Biológicas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36829/63CTS.v1i1.1

Abstract

Comparison was raised in three landscape categories (continuous forest, fragmented forest and agricultural or farming areas) in Sacatepéquez and Chimaltenango, Guatemala; defined on the basis of their degree of fragmentation and types of land use, during the dry and rainy seasons of 2012. It sought to determine patterns of bee diversity variation among the three landscape categories, and identify changes in community composition. The results point towards two general situations: (1) Difference in bee diversity was observed in different types of vegetation, this being highest at sites corresponding to the fragmented forest category. This category has a greater heterogeneity in landscape configuration, composed of fragmented forest and agricultural areas. In addition, the continuous forest category had higher abundance of individuals, both in the dry and rainy seasons. (2) Some degree of clustering of the sampling sites was observed, but it seems to respond to geographical closeness among them rather than to differences in land use. Also, frequency of floral visits made by bees to different botanical families are reported. The protection of forest remnants, both fragmented and continuous, is highly recommended in order to preserve pollination services given by native bees to natural and agricultural systems in the study area.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aguirre, A., & Dirzo, R. (2008). Effects of fragmentation on pollination abundance and fruit set of an abundant understory palm in a Mexican tropical forest. Biological Conservation, 141, 375-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.09.014

Allen-Wardell, G., Bernhardt, P., Bitner, R., Burquez, A., Buchman, S., Cane, J. …Nabhan, G. (1998). The potential consequences of pollinator declines on the conservation of Biodiversity and stability of food crop yields. Conservation Biology, 12, 8-17. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.97154.x

Armas, A. (2009). Riqueza y distribución potencial de las abejas euglosinas (Apinae: Euglossini) en Guatemala. (Tesis de licenciatura). Univer- sidad de San Carlos de Guatemala, Guatemala. Recuperado de http://biblioteca.usac.edu.gt/tesis/06/06_2743.pdf

Barrientos, M., Avendaño, C., Yurrita, C., Hernández, J., y Barrios, M. (2008). Interacción de los po- linizadores con la estructura y funcionamiento del paisaje en Chelemhá, Alta Verapaz. (Proyecto FODECYT 25-2004). Guatemala: Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacia, Escuela de Biología.

Enríquez, E. (2007). Diversidad de potenciales poli- nizadores del grupo de los insectos en el Parque Nacional Laguna Lachuá y su zona de influencia a lo largo de un año. (Proyecto FODECTY 017- 2006). Guatemala: Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacia.

Escobedo, N. (2011). Estacionalidad del uso del polen de cardamomo (Elettaria cardamomum) por la apifauna (Himenoptera: Apoidea) e la Zona de Influencia del Parque Nacional Laguna Lachúa. (Tesis de licenciatura). Facultad de Ciencias Quí- micas y Farmacia, Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala, Guatemala.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2006). Economic valuation of pollination services, review of methods. Agriculture Department, Seed and Plant Genetic Resources Division. Recuperado de http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/agphome/ documents/ Biodiversity-pollination/econvaluepoll1.pdf

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Na- tions. (2008). Global actions on pollination ser- vices for sustainable agriculture. Agriculture Department, Seed and Plant Genetic Resources Division. Recuperado de http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/ agphome/documents/Biodiversity-pollination/Pollination-FolderFlyer_web.pdf

Greenleaf, S., & Kremen, C. (2006). Wild bee spe- cies increase tomato production and respond differently to surrounding land use in Northern California. Biological Conservation, 133, 81-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.05.025

Greer, L. (1999). Alternative pollinators: Native Bees. ATTRA. IP 126, 14.

Hammer, Ø., Harper, D., & Ryan, P. (2001). PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4(1), 9. Recuperado de http://palaeo- electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm

Kearns, C., Inouye, D., & Waser, N. (1998). Endangered mutualisms: the conservation of plant-pollinator interactions. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 29, 83-112. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.83

Kevan, P., & Phillips, T. (2001). The economic impacts of pollinator declines: an approach to assessing the consequences. Conservation Ecology, 5(1), 8.https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00272-050108

Luig, J., Peterson, K., & Poltimäe, H. (2005). Human impacts on pollinators and pollination services. Socio-economic Working Paper. Tallinn: Proyecto ALARM, 10.

Maccagnani, B., Burgio, G., Stanisavljević, L., & Mani, S. (2007), Osmia cornuta management in pear orchards. Bulletin of Insectology, 60(1), 77-82.

Marroquín, A. (2000). Sistemática e historia natural de las abejas (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) de Guate- mala. (Tesis de licenciatura). Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacia, Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala, Guatemala.

Michener, C. (2007). The bees of the World. (2nd ed.). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

Ministerio de Agricultura, Ganadería y Alimentación. (2006). Ortofotos de la República de Guatemala. Guatemala: Autor.

Murren, C. (2002). Effects of habitat fragmentation on pollination: pollinia viability and reproductive success. Journal of Ecology, 90, 100-107. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0022-0477.2001.00638.x

Quesada, M., Rosas, F., Lopez-Araiza-Mikel, M., Agui- lar, R., Ashworth, L., Rosas-Guerrero … Martén- Rodríguez, S. (2012). Ecología y conservación biológica de sistemas de polinización en plantas tropicales. En E. Val y K. Boege (Eds.), Ecología y evolución de las interacciones bióticas (p. 81- 83). México: Universidad Autónoma de México, Colección Ediciones Científicas Universitarias.

Ricketts, T., Gretchen, C., Daily, P., Ehrlich, R., & Michener, C. (2004). Economic value of tropical forest to coffee production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 12579-12582. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0405147101

Rodríguez, G. (2008). Patrones temporales en la diver- sidad de abejas nativas (Hymenoptera: Apidae) en la región semiárida del Valle del Motagua. (Tesis de licenciatura). Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacia, Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala, Guatemala.

Shepherd M., Buchman, S., Vaughan, M., & Hoffman, S. (2003). Pollinator Conservation Handbook. Portland: The Xerces Society. Oregon.

Vásquez M., Yurrita, C. y Escobedo, N. (2010). De- terminación de la diversidad y distribución de las especies de abejorros (Bombus) en las áreas bióticas Chimalteca, Volcánica y Escuintleca en Guatemala. (Proyecto FODECYT 013-2009) Guatemala: Universidad de San Carlos de Guate- mala, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacia.

Diagrama de conglomerados

Published

2014-10-12

How to Cite

Escobedo Kenefic, N., Dardón Peralta, M. J., López, J. E., Martí­nez, O., & Cardona, E. (2014). Effect of landscape configuration on bee communities (Apoidea) of an oak-pine. Ciencia, Tecnología Y Salud, 1(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.36829/63CTS.v1i1.1

Issue

Section

Artículos científicos