Desarrollo de un prototipo para la vinculación de los actores del ecosistema de innovación universitario
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36829/63CTS.v11i1.1679Palabras clave:
Design Thinking, CECIAC, emprendimiento, Lean Canvas, modelo CanvasResumen
Las universidades desempeñan un papel fundamental en la dinamización de los ecosistemas de innovación al ser fuentes primordiales de conocimiento que fluye hacia los sectores público, privado y académico. Sin embargo, este flujo de conocimiento se ve obstaculizado por la carencia de canales de comunicación efectivos. Para abordar esta problemática, este estudio se enfocó en la concepción y desarrollo de un prototipo para dispositivos móviles y tabletas, utilizando metodologías Lean y herramientas de pensamiento de diseño. En las etapas de definición, investigación e ideación, se emplearon las metodologías de propuesta de valor y modelo Lean Canvas, con la participación de representantes de instituciones universitarias de España, Panamá, Guatemala, Perú, Ecuador, Argentina, Colombia y Chile. El desarrollo del prototipo, que incluye una aplicación para móviles y otra para tabletas, se llevó a cabo en Ecuador. Los prototipos desarrollados incluyen una interfaz con funcionalidades específicas, como la capacidad de búsqueda de inversionistas para sus proyectos y la posibilidad de establecer redes con distintas universidades. Además, permite a los usuarios crear y publicar noticias, ver el estatus de los proyectos y realizar preguntas a expertos. Estos prototipos fueron diseñados para crear un espacio dinámico donde investigadores, emprendedores, empresarios, inversionistas y mentores puedan interactuar de manera fluida. El impacto potencial de estas aplicaciones radica en su capacidad para fomentar, fortalecer y potencializar los vínculos y canales de comunicación entre todos los actores del ecosistema de innovación universitario.
Descargas
Citas
Abello Llanos, R., & Pardo Sánchez, K. (2014). Modelos de investigación y desarrollo en instituciones de educación superior en Colombia: El caso de la universidad del norte en la región caribe de Colombia. Investigación & Desarrollo, 22, 187-211.
Alka, T. A., Sreenivasan, A., & Suresh, M. (2024). Wheel of change: A systematic literature review on innovation and entrepreneurship in micro mobility solutions. Transport Economics and Management, 2, 154-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.team.2024.06.004
Almpanopoulou, A., Ritala, P., & Blomqvist, K. (2019). Innovation Ecosystem Emergence Barriers: Institutional Perspective. Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2019.764
Al-Youbi, A. O., Zahed, A. H. M., Nahas, M. N., & Hegazy, A. A. (2021). The roles of universities in development. En A. O. AI-Youbi, A. H. M. Zahed, M. N. Nahas, & A. A. Hegazy (Eds.), The Leading World’s Most Innovative Universities (pp. 1-8). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59694-1_1
Angrisani, M., Cannavacciuolo, L., & Rippa, P. (2023). Framing the main patterns of an academic innovation ecosystem. Evidence from a knowledge-intensive case study. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 29(11), 109-131. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-12-2022-1088
Apostolidou, A. (2022). Digitally situated knowledge: Connectivism, anthropology and epistemological pluralism. International Journal of Educational Research, 115, 102047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.102047
Asplund, F., Björk, J., Magnusson, M., & Patrick, A. J. (2021). The genesis of public-private innovation ecosystems: Bias and challenges. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, Artículo 120378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120378
Babina, T., Fedyk, A., He, A., & Hodson, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence, firm growth, and product innovation. Journal of Financial Economics, 151, Artículo 103745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2023.103745
Baker III, F. W., & Moukhliss, S. (2020). Concretising Design Thinking: A content analysis of systematic and extended literature reviews on Design Thinking and human-centred design. Review of Education, 8(1), 305-333. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3186
Barrios M. (2012). Marketing de la Experiencia: Principales conceptos y características. Palermo Business Review, (7) 67-90.
Bataineh, M. J., Sánchez-Sellero, P., & Ayad, F. (2023). The role of organizational innovation in the development of green innovations in Spanish firms. European Management Journal, 4(4), 527-538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2023.01.006
Beyhan, B., & Findik, D. (2018). Student and graduate entrepreneurship: Ambidextrous universities create more nascent entrepreneurs. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(5), 1346-1374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9590-z
Bocken, N., Strupeit, L., Whalen, K., & Nußholz, J. (2019). A review and evaluation of Circular Business Model Innovation Tools. Sustainability, 11(8), Artículo 2210. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082210
Bouwman, H., Nikou, S., & de Reuver, M. (2019). Digitalization, business models, and SMEs: How do business model innovation practices improve performance of digitalizing SMEs? Telecommunications Policy, 43(9), Artículo 101828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101828
Bradford, K. J., Hatley, R., & MacInnis, D. (2023). Failure is not an option, but it should be: Evaluating the positive impacts of company failures in space Innovation Ecosystems. New Space, 11(3), 151-161. https://doi.org/10.1089/space.2022.0013
Cai, Y., & Lattu, A. (2022). Triple Helix or Quadruple Helix: Which model of innovation to choose for empirical studies? Minerva, 60(2), 257-280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-021-09453-6
Cai, Y., Ma, J., & Chen, Q. (2020). Higher education in Innovation Ecosystems. Sustainability, 12(11), Artículo 4376. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114376
Cuc, J. E. (2022). El Ecosistema Emprendedor como estructura para la cocreación de valor y redes de cooperación: Caso de estudio Guatemala. Revista Académica ECO, 26(1), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.36631/ECO.2022.26.01
Dias Sant´Ana, T., de Souza Bermejo, P. H., Moreira, M. F., & de Souza, W. V. B. (2020). The structure of an innovation ecosystem: Foundations for future research. Management Decision, 58(12), 2725-2742. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-03-2019-0383
Dziubaniuk, O., Ivanova-Gongne, M., & Nyholm, M. (2023). Learning and teaching sustainable business in the digital era: A connectivism theory approach. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), Artículo 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00390-w
Ferreira-Herrera, D. C. (2016). El modelo CANVAS en la formulación de proyectos. Cooperativismo & Desarrollo, 23(107), 69-80. https://doi.org/10.16925/co.v23i107.1252
Flores-Aguilar, E. (2019). Diseño de un centro para emprendedores en una escuela profesional de Ingeniería aplicando el modelo Lean Canvas. Formación Universitaria, 12(6), 151-166. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062019000600151
Fraccascia, L., & Nastasi, A. (2023). Mobile apps against food waste: Are consumers willing to use them? A survey research on Italian consumers. Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances, 18, Artículo 200150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcradv.2023.200150
Granst rand, O., & Holgersson, M. (2020). Innovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition. Technovation, 90-91, Artículo 102098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2019.102098
Grobbelaar, S. S. (2018). Developing a local innovation ecosystem through a university coordinated innovation platform: The university of Fort Hare. Development Southern Africa, 35(5), 657-672. https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2017.1421902
Hael, M., Belhaj, F. A., & Zhang, H. (2024). Organizational learning and innovation: A bibliometric analysis and future research agenda. Heliyon, 10(11), Artículo e31812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31812
Heaton, S., Siegel, D. S., & Teece, D. J. (2019). Universities and innovation ecosystems: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Industrial and Corporate Change, 28(4), 921-939. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtz038
Huang, Y., Li, P., Bu, Y., & Zhao, G. (2023). What entrepreneurial ecosystem elements promote sustainable entrepreneurship? Journal of Cleaner Production, 422, Artículo 138459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138459
Liedtka, J. (2015). Perspective: Linking Design Thinking with innovation outcomes through cognitive bias reduction. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(6), 925-938. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12163
Liu, X., & Li, H. (2021). A preliminary study on connectivism-constructivism learning theory based on developmental cognitive neuroscience and spiking neural network. Open Journal of Applied Sciences, 11(08), 874-884. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojapps.2021.118064
Lu, Y., & Xiong, T. (2023). The attitudes of high school students and teachers toward mobile apps for learning English: A Q methodology study. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), Artículo 100555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100555
Lugmayr, A., Stockleben, B., Zou, Y., Anzenhofer, S., & Jalonen, M. (2014). Applying “Design Thinking” in the context of media management education. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 71(1), 119-157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-013-1361-8
Luitel, N. P., Neupane, V., Lamichhane, B., Koirala, G. P., Gautam, K., Karki, E., Adhikari, S., Votruba, N., Jordans, M. J. D., Kohrt, B. A., Carswell, K., Thornicroft, G., & Lempp, H. (2023). Experience of primary healthcare workers in using the mobile app-based WHO mhGAP intervention guide in detection and treatment of people with mental disorders: A qualitative study in Nepal. SSM - Mental Health, 4, Artículo 100278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmmh.2023.100278
Mampota, S., Mokhets’engoane, S. J., & Kurata, L. (2023). Connectivism Theory: Exploring its relevance in informing Lesotho’s integrated curriculum for effective learning in the Digital Age. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 4(4), 6-12. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.4.705
Marr, B. (2022, Oct 3). The 5 biggest business trends in 2023 everyone must get ready for now. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2022/10/03/the-5-biggest-business-trends-for-2023/?sh=34b0a8b84217
Moreira, A., Navaia, E., & Ribau, C. (2024). Innovation capabilities and their dimensions: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Innovation Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2024.07.001
Nguyen-Thi, H. (2024). Fostering Design Thinking mindset for university students with NPCs in the Metaverse. Heliyon, Artículo e34964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34964
OECD & Eurostat. (2018). Oslo Manual 2018. Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation (4th ed.), The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en
Partanen, J., Chetty, S. K., & Rajala, A. (2014). Innovation types and network relationships. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(5), 1027-1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00474.x
Patzelt, H., & Shepherd, D. A. (2009). Strategic entrepreneurship at universities: Academic entrepreneurs’ assessment of policy programs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(1), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00291.x
Purchase, S., & Volery, T. (2020). Marketing innovation: A systematic review. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(9-10), 763-793. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2020.1774631
Quiñones Montellano, A., & Tezanos Vázquez, S. (2015). CYTED: ¿Una apuesta progresiva por la financiación de la ciencia y la tecnología en Iberoamérica? Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia Tecnología y Sociedad, 10(29), 191-210.
Rabelo Neto, J., Figueiredo, C., Gabriel, B. C., & Valente, R. (2024). Factors for innovation ecosystem frameworks: Comprehensive organizational aspects for evolution. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 203, Artículo 123383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123383
Ramadani, V., Hisrich, R. D., Abazi-Alili, H., Dana, L.-P., Panthi, L., & Abazi-Bexheti, L. (2019). Product innovation and firm performance in transition economies: A multi-stage estimation approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140, 271-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.010
Ramos Méndez, E., Arceo Moheno, G., & Almeida Aguilar, M. A. (2021). Las TIC’s en la innovación de los procesos organizacionales de las pequeñas y medianas empresas. Vinculatégica, 7(2), 797-809. https://doi.org/10.29105/vtga7.1-144
Rodríguez-Rebés, L., Ibar-Alonso, R., Gómez, L. M. R., & Navío-Marco, J. (2024). The use and drivers of organisational eco-innovation in European SMEs. Research in International Business and Finance, 70, Artículo 102297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102297
Rylander Eklund, A., Navarro Aguiar, U., & Amacker, A. (2022). Design thinking as sensemaking: Developing a pragmatist theory of practice to (re)introduce sensibility. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 39(1), 24-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12604
Saunila, M. (2020). Innovation capability in SMEs: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(4), 260-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.11.002
Schimperna, F., Nappo, F., & Marsigalia, B. (2022). Student entrepreneurship in universities: The State-of-the-Art. Administrative Sciences, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12010005
Shih, T., Hu, M.-C., & Chou, J. C.-P. (2024). Navigating an emerging innovation ecosystem: A case study of fuel cell innovation in Taiwan. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2024.2352734
Silva, P. M., Moutinho, V. F., & Moreira, A. C. (2022). Do social and economic factors affect the technical efficiency in entrepreneurship activities? Evidence from European countries using a two-stage DEA model. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 82, Artículo 101314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101314
Singh, S. (2006). Impact of color on marketing. Management Decision, 44(6), 783-789. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740610673332
Thomas, E., Faccin, K., & Asheim, B. T. (2021). Universities as orchestrators of the development of regional innovation ecosystems in emerging economies. Growth and Change, 52(2), 770-789. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.2442
Tsai, C.-A., Song, M.-Y. W., Lo, Y.-F., & Lo, C.-C. (2023). Design thinking with constructivist learning increases the learning motivation and wicked problem-solving capability - An empirical research in Taiwan. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 50, Artículo 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101385
Wang, M., Li, Y., Li, J., & Wang, Z. (2021). Green process innovation, green product innovation and its economic performance improvement paths: A survey and structural model. Journal of Environmental Management, 297, Artículo 113282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113282
Wang, Y., Hong, A., Li, X., & Gao, J. (2020). Marketing innovations during a global crisis: A study of China firms’ response to COVID-19. Journal of Business Research, 116, 214-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.029
Yin, D., Ming, X., & Zhang, X. (2020). Sustainable and smart product innovation ecosystem: An integrative status review and future perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 274, Artículo 123005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123005
Zhang, J., Calabrese, C., Ding, J., Liu, M., & Zhang, B. (2018). Advantages and challenges in using mobile apps for field experiments: A systematic review and a case study. Mobile Media & Communication, 6(2), 179-196. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157917725550
Descargas
Archivos adicionales
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Edward M.A. Guerrero Gutiérrez, Johanna Pelay, Zoila Guerra de Castillo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
El autor que publique en esta revista acepta las siguientes condiciones:
- El autor otorga a la Dirección General de Investigación el derecho de editar, reproducir, publicar y difundir el manuscrito en forma impresa o electrónica en la revista Ciencia, Tecnología y Salud.
- La Direción General de Investigación otorgará a la obra una licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional