Studying morality as a complex and real entity Ontological and epistemological considerations in ethics research and their methodological implications

Authors

  • Manuel González-Ávila

Keywords:

morality, ethics, sciencie, complexity, transdisciplinarity

Abstract

Although reason is not all in human relationships, there are values and a promises in rationality. It helps us make sense in the world and in our actions. For many reasons it is important to combat all kinds of fundamentalism. Academic work with social significance requires constant efforts to eliminate those thoughts that claim to be definitive, the ultimate truth. This idea is relevant in studies of moral dilemmas, as it involves critical and self-critical thought. The starting point is reflection on reality. Let us start with some of the more basic questions: What is reality? How is it? Why is it important to talk about it? What is moral? What are the main ontological ideas about morality? What are the main features of morality? What are the contributions of certain notions such as complexity and transdisciplinarity to a better understanding of reality and moral reality? Morality, being an important aspect of social reality, is accessible to the procedures of science, not only of philosophy. However, we note with concern how often studies on Ethics are omitted from major conferences and documents, sociological or psychological works, as well as from financial, commercial and political practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Manuel González-Ávila

Cirujano Dentista graduado en la Facultad de Odontologí­a, Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala, 1969. Maestrí­a en Ciencias (MS) en Fisiologí­a y Biofí­sica en la Universidad de Alabama, 1971. Doctorado (Ph.D.) en Fisiologí­a y Biofí­sica en la Universidad de Alabama, 973. Premio Hatton de la Asociación Internacional de Investigación Dental, 1971. Director General de Investigación y Director General de Extensión Universitaria, niversidad de San Carlos de Guatemala. Presidente de la Academia de Ciencias Médicas, Fí­sicas y Naturales de Guatemala.

References

Camps, V., Guariglia, O. y Salmerón F. (1992). Concepciones de la ética. Madrid, España: Editorial Trotta.

Delanty, G y Strydom, P (2003). Philosophies of social science. Maidenhead, Berkshire, Inglaterra: Open University Press.

Gensler, H. (2000). Ethics. A contemporary introduction. London, Inglaterra: Routledge.

González, M. (2007). Complejidad y el Movimiento Universitario. En Al margen de los márgenes. Transdisciplinariedad y Complejidad (pp. 49-90). San Juan, Puerto Rico: University of Puerto Rico at Humacao y Koiné, Inc.

Gutiérrez, J y Delgado, J. (1999). Introducción. En Métodos y técnicas cualitativas de investigación en ciencias sociales (pp. 41-50). Madrid, España: Síntesis Psicología.

Habermas, J., y Mardomingo, J. (2000). Aclaraciones a la etica del discurso (pp. 15-33). Madrid: Editorial Trotta.

Morin, E. (2004). La epistemología de la complejidad. Gazeta de Antropología, 20, 2. Recuperado el 2 septiembre 2014 de https://digibug.ugr.es/handle/10481/7253

Mouffe, C. (2000). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism. Viena: Institute for Advanced Studies, Recuperado el 17 de agosto de 2012 de https://www.ihs.ac.at/publications/pol/pw_72.pdf

Sapag-Hagar, M (2009). Bioética: Al encuentro de una conciencia. Santiago: Chile: Centro Interdisciplinario de Estudios en Bioética. Recuperado el 20 agosto de 2014 de http://www.paho.org/Spanish/BIO/biofarma.pdf

Singer, P. (2000). A Companion to Ethics. Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishers.

Published

2015-11-16

How to Cite

González-Ávila, M. (2015). Studying morality as a complex and real entity Ontological and epistemological considerations in ethics research and their methodological implications. Ciencias Sociales Y Humanidades, 2(2), 85–94. Retrieved from https://revistas.usac.edu.gt/index.php/csh/article/view/135

Issue

Section

Ensayos