Studying morality as a complex and real entity Ontological and epistemological considerations in ethics research and their methodological implications
Keywords:
morality, ethics, sciencie, complexity, transdisciplinarityAbstract
Although reason is not all in human relationships, there are values and a promises in rationality. It helps us make sense in the world and in our actions. For many reasons it is important to combat all kinds of fundamentalism. Academic work with social significance requires constant efforts to eliminate those thoughts that claim to be definitive, the ultimate truth. This idea is relevant in studies of moral dilemmas, as it involves critical and self-critical thought. The starting point is reflection on reality. Let us start with some of the more basic questions: What is reality? How is it? Why is it important to talk about it? What is moral? What are the main ontological ideas about morality? What are the main features of morality? What are the contributions of certain notions such as complexity and transdisciplinarity to a better understanding of reality and moral reality? Morality, being an important aspect of social reality, is accessible to the procedures of science, not only of philosophy. However, we note with concern how often studies on Ethics are omitted from major conferences and documents, sociological or psychological works, as well as from financial, commercial and political practices.
Downloads
References
Camps, V., Guariglia, O. y Salmerón F. (1992). Concepciones de la ética. Madrid, España: Editorial Trotta.
Delanty, G y Strydom, P (2003). Philosophies of social science. Maidenhead, Berkshire, Inglaterra: Open University Press.
Gensler, H. (2000). Ethics. A contemporary introduction. London, Inglaterra: Routledge.
González, M. (2007). Complejidad y el Movimiento Universitario. En Al margen de los márgenes. Transdisciplinariedad y Complejidad (pp. 49-90). San Juan, Puerto Rico: University of Puerto Rico at Humacao y Koiné, Inc.
Gutiérrez, J y Delgado, J. (1999). Introducción. En Métodos y técnicas cualitativas de investigación en ciencias sociales (pp. 41-50). Madrid, España: Síntesis Psicología.
Habermas, J., y Mardomingo, J. (2000). Aclaraciones a la etica del discurso (pp. 15-33). Madrid: Editorial Trotta.
Morin, E. (2004). La epistemología de la complejidad. Gazeta de Antropología, 20, 2. Recuperado el 2 septiembre 2014 de https://digibug.ugr.es/handle/10481/7253
Mouffe, C. (2000). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism. Viena: Institute for Advanced Studies, Recuperado el 17 de agosto de 2012 de https://www.ihs.ac.at/publications/pol/pw_72.pdf
Sapag-Hagar, M (2009). Bioética: Al encuentro de una conciencia. Santiago: Chile: Centro Interdisciplinario de Estudios en Bioética. Recuperado el 20 agosto de 2014 de http://www.paho.org/Spanish/BIO/biofarma.pdf
Singer, P. (2000). A Companion to Ethics. Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishers.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Manuel González-Ávila
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
El autor que publique en esta revista acepta las siguientes condiciones:
- El autor otorga a la Dirección General de Investigación el derecho de editar, reproducir, publicar y difundir el manuscrito en forma impresa o electrónica en la revista Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades.
- La Direción General de Investigación otorgará a la obra una licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional.